Voting fraud should be the top priority for anyone who cares about democracy. In the recent Ohio election, several “good democracy” initiatives were on the ballot; notably, giving districting power to an independent commission (to limit partisan gerrymandering).
The Columbus Dispatch (which had produced “uncannily accurate [results] for decades”) polled voters soon before the initiatives. Also, soon before the initiatives, Ohio rolled out shiny new Diebold machines in about half of its counties. The results? The “good democracy” initiatives were overwhelmingly defeated, despite overwhelming public support in the polls. The one relatively uncontroversial issue (Issue 1) passed basically just as planned.
ISSUE 1 ($2 Billion State Bond initiative)
PRE-POLLING: 53% Yes, 27% No, 20% Undecided
FINAL RESULT: 54% Yes, 45% No
ISSUE 2 (Allow easier absentee balloting)
PRE-POLLING: 59% Yes, 33% No, 9% Undecided
FINAL RESULT: 36% Yes, 63% No
ISSUE 3 (Revise campaign contribution limits)
PRE-POLLING: 61% Yes, 25% No, 14% Undecided
FINAL RESULT: 33% Yes, 66% No
ISSUE 4 (Ind. Comm. to draw Congressional Districts)
PRE-POLLING: 31% Yes, 45% No, 25% Undecided
FINAL RESULT: 30% Yes, 69% No
ISSUE 5 (Ind. Board instead of Sec. of State to oversee elections)
PRE-POLLING: 41% Yes, 43% No, 16% Undecided
FINAL RESULT: 29% Yes, 70% No
These results are so egregiously blatant that it just has to be news, right?
Wrong. The discrepancies have not been reported or mentioned *anywhere* in the mainstream media, much like the discrepancies in 2004 between exit polls and vote results.
For more details, see The Brad Blog.